• Alex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    So I may be biased but what is vmwares USP? From my limited experience it was a slightly more polished GUI for creating VMs and the ability to run on older pre-virt hardware. Is the experience still objectively better than the alternatives?

    • Muddybulldog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you’re running a lab or a small shop any hypervisor can likely do the job. Anything above that VMware’s overall ecosystem is the most robust and well-supported.

      At this point virtualization is a legacy technology. It’s not going to disappear tomorrow but its clock is ticking the same way the clock was ticking for mainframes thirty years ago. Plenty of mainframes still out there but nobody is implementing new. Same can be said for virtualization. It’s a limited market with significantly slowed growth over where it was a decade ago.

      The move to a subscription model will let them squeeze every last dollar out of the technology while they still can.

      • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Please forgive a wildly uninformed question: What is it that VMware does today that isn’t covered by Docker?

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Storage, software defined networking, performance metrics, VDIs, endpoint security, virtualization on the desktop.

          Not to mention, a lot of workloads aren’t suited to containers. The vast majority of business software isn’t containerized, and it would be wildly cost-prohibitive for me to shoehorn that square peg into the round hole of virtualization.