• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Uh, it is hard. If it wasn’t they wouldn’t pay you for it.

    Don’t sell yourself short.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Then I guess I don’t understand what point you’re arguing.

      Because I guarantee someone would do the job if the data was available.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Who’s going to pay for that data from every tiny PD to be sanitized? Every PD will be slightly different and they may change vendors every couple of years. It sounds like a nightmare.

        My point is you don’t want or need “all the data”. You only want the 0.001% that involves use of force.

        • Baahb@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You have a bad take. Yes all of the data. If my offense are public information, then offenses against the public, mundane or severe, should be public.

          Edit: on retrospect, police conduct data should be public regardless of the public status of my or your record.

          Offences against the public should be documented publicly.

        • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          My job has clients who change vendors constantly, too.

          It’s not nearly as big a deal as you’re making it out to be, especially since you don’t even know if your unlikely hypothetical scenario even happens.

          So… Whatever I guess.