You’re telling me that shocking one’s nards on a hunch and writing it down isn’t real research?

I’m starting to think I know nothing about science. What have I been doing?

There’s also a fantastic book called The Reactionary Mind that’s the best thing I’ve read on conservative ideology. The newest edition has updated chapters through the Trump administration. It’s essential reading, in my opinion, for understanding what drives them.

He also has a great chapter shredding Ayn Rand to bits.

I think they just whittled down their ideology into the most privileged and selfish extreme. They do believe the insane things they spout like “tax is theft.”

I think you’re right that the rank-and-file libertarians don’t really think their ideology through or educate themselves on its flaws or alternatives, because it really is about identity. I’m pretty convinced that it always has been though. Conservative ideology is based on hierarchy, and they think the right outcomes result from having the proper social stratification— this is usually wealth-based.

Cubism is such a hard style. Incredible work.

“Transsexual” is kind of being phased out in favor of “Transgender,” I believe.

Remember when I said you weren’t up to the task?

Hit and run like a coward. You blocked me because you’re well aware that you’re unable to defend your position.

There are other people who have explained this to you already.

That’s stupid.

Gender and sex are not exactly the same thing, and you have to be purposefully obtuse to ignore the entire context of the conversation. I won’t entertain your faux ignorance. You’ve had multiple people correct you on this, and you haven’t responded to any of them, because you know you’re not up to the task.

If you say sex=gender, you are factually incorrect. Try again. If they were exactly synonymous, then words would also have a sex. Tell me where “telephone’s” genitalia are.

Who is rejecting biology?

Other than Dawkins I mean?

It seems like you’re confused between sex and gender?

But there’s nothing religious or dogmatic about what the FFRF did. Dawkins is just framing it that way because it’s how he became popular.

He’s just an asshole who constantly acts like an asshole, and people are done with his shit, so he’s having a little fit on his way out the door.

If anyone is acting “religiously” here, it’s Dawkins, who constantly lies and misrepresents medical science because it doesn’t match up the beliefs he grew up with.

Same, honestly. I’d kill for a remaster or a proper sequel.

Loved Freelancer! Did you try the Everspace games? They’re the closest to a spiritual successor that I’ve played.

Yeah, telling your superior to obey obvious ethical standards undermines their authority.

How dare he expect the highest court in the country abide by the same standards as the rest of the judiciary; doesn’t he know who they are??

A save-scumming wizard could be a great main character.

What is your budget?

The whole idea of parading suspects in front of the media is a mockery of the principle.

Fuck the NYPD.

Right?

When your business model is an engine that creates desperate people with nothing to lose, you have to expect something like this.

Oof, thanks for the warning. I was wondering if I should stain him, I think I will.

I don’t play many free games, they’re too expense.