No, I mean the NRA. Why aren’t they leaping to his defense? Much like how they didn’t leap to the defense of a black legal gun owner who was murdered by police.
Weird, you’d think those two national news cases would be exactly the time for an organization that claims to be a gun rights organization would make a highly publicized exception for.
Kyle Rittenhouse? They were behind him all the way.
It sure sounds more like they don’t care about gun owners when they don’t look a certain way or have a certain political bent.
You mean the ATF? The atf is the government department dedicated to guns. The NRA is a pro-guns lobby group.
They’re talking about the Russian intelligence asset who was working for the NRA. Not sure where the Roberts angle is coming from though:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44885633
No, I mean the NRA. Why aren’t they leaping to his defense? Much like how they didn’t leap to the defense of a black legal gun owner who was murdered by police.
They generally dont do that. Theres a highly publicized exception every once in a while, but it is not the norm.
Weird, you’d think those two national news cases would be exactly the time for an organization that claims to be a gun rights organization would make a highly publicized exception for.
Kyle Rittenhouse? They were behind him all the way.
It sure sounds more like they don’t care about gun owners when they don’t look a certain way or have a certain political bent.