• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Raises prices by $1, lower them by $0.25 a year later, and if you own all major media, they’ll tell people it’s something to celebrate while ignoring prices are still arbitrarily inflated.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I assume this is not a benevolent action, but a gimmick to get people back to spending more.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Your assumption appears to be correct. They even state they want to break consumers out of the frugal habit (paraphrasing).

      People are broke, you dumb twats.

      • lettruthout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        And we’re learning how to frugal better, therefore buying less in the future too. I do not feel sorry for the shareholders.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        “People are broke, you dumb twats.”

        I want to make this into a billboard that we lease right outside the CEO of walgreens office window.

        Then I want to send him a T-Shirt with this on it.

        And then a custom doormat to put outside his house.

        …how hard would it be to tattoo it on his forehead without him noticing until after we’re done/gone? I don’t even want him to know we’ve been there.

      • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Want us to spend more money and buy more crap? Simple, pay us more and we spend more. I used to spend $20 a week on lunches and $10 a week on coffee and muffin for breakfast, I stopped when it was $20 a week for coffee/muffin and $30+ for lunch. If my minimum spending on my basics is leaving me with less each month, I am going to start cutting back on even that. I guess if you want a cut of my money you need to find a way to get more out of my LL cause that is where most of it goes now, or the utilities. Something, something, blood from a stone.

    • visor841@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Even if it wasn’t a gimmick, it still wouldn’t be benevolent. Corporations only lower prices when they think the lower price can make them more money overall.

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The only reason they’re doing this is because they realized they’ll make more money by lowering prices. Do not mistake this as good will.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m going to use fake numbers here for the sake of simplicity to explain a concept of what just happened.

      2020 absolutely had inflation from multiple different reasons. But…most of those reasons were temporary, which have now resolved.

      So, here’s where those fake numbers come in.

      Lets say 2019 prices were around a 5% inflation. There is no covid. It’s the last year of normal life. Stores aren’t going crazy.

      2020 comes, all hell breaks loose. Actual inflation is now at 13%. But stores are trying to figure out how to stay alive. So they charge as if we’re at 22% inflation. This massive jump makes consumers buy considerably less. Spend more currency, but buy less product.

      The end result is these companies made record profits selling less.

      And then the work shortages caught up. The shipping shortages caught up. The microchip production resumed. And that temporary actual inflation fell. But because our country has never had a situation where inflation might fall, stores have just kept charging that 22% inflation prices, even though they’re paying maybe 7% inflation now. A realistic jump considering everything thats happened.

      Meanwhile consumers are seeing gatoraide shrink from 32 to 28 oz, and instead of charging $1.25 for it, it’s being sold for $3. And consumers are saying “I’M NOT PAYING MORE TO GET LESS!”

      And so stores are probably going to drop that $3 to $1.75. You’re still paying more and getting less, but that $3 price is in your mind now so you think you’re paying a normal fair price, rather than getting ripped off compared to 5 years ago.

      So instead of charging 22%, now the artificial inflation is at 16% while actual inflation is 13%. They’re still ripping you off, but now they want to continue to rip you off. Can’t rip you off if you buy nothing.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is what’s actually meant by the “invisible hand.” They pushed prices past what the market was willing to bear, and lost sales as people made do without. Now they’re adjusting prices back down, because it makes more sense to accept a smaller margin and make it up in volume. It’s a textbook example of the demand curve in action.

      When market-based systems work, they work fairly elegantly. It’s the cases where they break down that I get concerned with.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    When Walgreens cuts prices, it’s usually shrinkflation. They often have deals on paper towels and toilet paper — but when you look at the sheet count, it’s about half of what you would get on the same roll at a grocery store.

    Same for fluid ounces on things like dish and laundry soap.

    • sudo42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      OMG. Just got burned by Walgreens by this. Went to buy eyedrops. The name brand was out, so I bought the Walgreens brand. Same size box, slightly over the (out of stock brand) price. Got home, opened the box… I’ve never seen a bottle of eyedrops so small. Normal bottle is 0.25 oz. This one was 0.08 oz.

      Fuck Walgreens.

      • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Eyedrops are ungodly expensive. If you can wait a day or two, Amazon will usually ship a two pack for less than a single one from Walgreens or CVS. No one can justify $19 for a single goddamn bottle of eyedrops.

        • sudo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s what I wound up doing. Purchased the name-brand drops (full-size) for 1/2 od what Walgreens wanted. F Walgreens.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      And it’s absurd what they charge for things like batteries, compared to other places.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Commence deflation.

    Corporations caused it to go up, now they must cause it to go down.

    This could get ugly. Guess what everyone, if we keep not shopping, they’ll do it again!

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fine by me. I gotta buy one pair of jeans, and after that my pockets are going to sound like somebody torturing Aberaham Lincoln. Because I’m pinching pennys REAL HARD.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I thought I found a bargain the other day because they had this big thing of tortilla chips for only $2! Wow!

        And then I got home and the bag was about 1/3 filled with chips. I forgot to check the weight versus a normal bag. I got swindled.