• Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema already said they weren’t going to support that, so what do you suggest the President do without a Senate majority?

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s crazy how often I see people doing this; they’re ardently against Trump’s efforts to turn the presidency into a dictatorship, while at the same time complaining that Biden didn’t do x y, or z when those aren’t things that fall under his purview.

      What do they want?? Dictatorship is ok if it’s the neo-liberal I like?

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Instead of trodding out the tired old excuses of Sinema and Manchin time and again for doing absolutely nothing, I suggest that instead Biden actually tries something. He could demand they be removed from the party. He could go to their home states in their home districts and loudly campaign for them to come around, all the while screaming from the rooftops how badly their constituents are being screwed by their reprehensible policies and refusal to cooperate. Force them to comply, or ensure their removal from office.

      But no, Biden is not this kind of leader. Instead he thinks of them as friends, and would never seek to challenge their positions for a meaningful political agenda. Perhaps this lack of initiative to deliver for the people is why Biden is so wildly unpopular, and hurtling towards a landslide defeat to the criminal traitor Trump in November. Trump may be a totally fake populist, but at least his messaging resonates with the pain and suffering felt at this time by the American people. Of course Trump has no agenda other than self enrichment, but he at least says things that people want to hear. DC insiders such as Biden, Manchin, and Sinema are totally oblivious to that reality.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        So, in effect: “idk do SOMETHING”? Or say the magic words that make his opponents agree with him?

        There’s an absurd idealism in some circles that saying the right words at the bully pulpit will let you achieve your goals and convince the people standing in your way to acquiesce. It does not work that way.

          • shottymcb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Biden doesn’t. Trump does. The court ruled that the court decides what is and is not an official act. The court will rule that nothing Biden does is an official act, while Trump could literally murder random people on 34th st, and it would be an official act.

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          It does not work that way

          Sure it does, look at how Trump made everyone bend the knee for 4 years. I’d like to see Biden try is all.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I think I see what you’re saying actually. Because yeah, that did work for Trump. But I think this is a fundamental difference between left and right (or center left and right if you prefer). The right values loyalty above even right wing ideology. The left doesn’t have that same kind of hero worship or allegiance.

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Those two should’ve been kicked out of the party a long time ago. Both are up for reelection this year and are not running as a democrat.

      • shottymcb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        What would that have solved exactly? Those seats wouldn’t have been won by anyone further left anyway. The problem is that North Dakota and California get the same number of Senators, despite the former having literally 50x more people.

        Which is why keeping the filibuster has generally been in the best interest of the left, even if it’s not ideal right now. I think the Democrats are absolutely fooling themselves if they think the R’s will respect the filibuster if it’s in their way at this point though.

        • sudo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You don’t have to replace them next election with a far left candidate, just one that won’t betray the party like those two shit-heads. You run the risk of losing the seat to the GOP but it was half GOP anyways and its worth it to maintain party discipline. Kick two senators out and no other senator is going to risk their career disobeying the party.

          Also what this utter nonesense about maintaining the filibuster? It can be removed with a simple majority and the GOP does so whenever they have that majority. Its been that way for decades. Saying “It’d be nice if the GOP kept the filibuster when they were in power so we will keep it when we’re in power.” is absolute bullshit. Democrats aren’t naiive idealists, they just want excuses to not do what their voters want.

    • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Oh then it’s okay he didn’t even try anything until he realized he was so unpopular people are asking him to step down.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not what I said bro.

        People need to be upset at Biden not doing things he has the ability to do, not things he doesn’t. Fixing SCOTUS isn’t going to happen without either a major legislative change or now (thanks to SCOTUS) Biden doing some major unsavory things he has absolute immunity for.

        • shottymcb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          On that last part, you’re not understanding the full awfulness of the ruling. The court ruled that the court decides what is and is not an official act. Biden has no immunity because this supreme court will 100% rule that anything Biden does is not an “official act”.