After giving in to Putin/Xi’s demands to not provide starlink internet service over Taiwan, DOD officials are growing nervous about trusting Elon’s Space company with our national secrets

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      To be fair here… The old guard still aren’t working on reuse even after SpaceX not only championed it but actually succeeded and proved reliability.

      The old launch providers are still just throwing their shit away and still cost billions of dollars for launches.

      The Commercial Resupply Service and Commercial Crew Programs have also achieved better standards than NASA had when they started them, and at much cheaper cost than the previous solutions.

      Privatisation isn’t inherently bad, and importantly, the money is still being handled through NASA for oversight.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          No, but they wouldn’t do anything beyond the exact specific minimums of the grant either.

          • Vox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            And you think a private business will do anything more than the minimum of a contract?

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            Huh? Why do you think this? The implication seems to be that they want to pocket the rest or something?

            Let’s not forget, we are talking about NASA here, not a private corporation. Why would an arm of the federal government have any interest in not doing “anything beyond the exact specific minimums of the grant”?

            I cannot speak to building rockets, but I do know about other types of government financing, and I can tell you that the scientists and engineers who would have received such a grant, would have no reason not to use as much of it as possible. In fact, that’s exactly how they would justify a need for more in the future.