sapient [they/them]@infosec.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 months agoAnti-Piracy Group Takes Prominent AI Training Dataset ”Books3′ Offlinetorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down14file-textcross-posted to: technews
arrow-up150arrow-down1external-linkAnti-Piracy Group Takes Prominent AI Training Dataset ”Books3′ Offlinetorrentfreak.comsapient [they/them]@infosec.pub to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technews
cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/tech/t/364852 Anti-piracy group Rights Alliance removed the prominent “Books3” database, that was used to train high profile AI models.
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 months agoIt may be illegal to distribute it, but it’s not illegal to read it. Or train an AI on it, which is the same process.
minus-squaremaynarkh@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoWould commercializing the trained AI count as a commercial public performance though? The legal problems with AI don’t come with the training, but when you start selling it.
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11 months agoI don’t see what the problem would be. The AI model and its outputs are not derivative works from a legal perspective.
It may be illegal to distribute it, but it’s not illegal to read it. Or train an AI on it, which is the same process.
Would commercializing the trained AI count as a commercial public performance though? The legal problems with AI don’t come with the training, but when you start selling it.
I don’t see what the problem would be. The AI model and its outputs are not derivative works from a legal perspective.