• Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    How can you consider yourself anti-imperialist when you’re talking about unilaterally giving entire countries to other countries?

    • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Is the Donbas a separate country because it declared independence from Ukraine?

      EDIT: Which is actually more than Taiwan has done, the government in exile on Taiwan considers itself the rightful government of the entirety of mainland China and parts of Mongolia.

      • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Way to just completely ignore my point and move the goal posts?

        Are the 13 colonies a separate country because they declared independence from the United Kingdom?

        Don’t bother replying. I don’t want waste my time talking to people who can’t answer a simple question

        • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m not moving the goalposts, I’m just pointing out that it’s a bit disingenuous to frame a question about what should happen in an unresolved civil war as a question of nations and their sovereignty. It would be disingenuous to frame Russia’s intervention in Ukraine as defending the independence of an entire country, I think it’s a similar situation between ROC/PRC, the primary difference being the length of the dispute.

          Which is relevant if we’re talking about how one can consistently be anti-imperialist, I think. I agree it’s a bit flippant to say stuff about ‘giving up Loser Island’ but I think it’s important to recognize that it’s more complicated than ‘two independent countries fighting over the territory of one of them.’

      • TheDankHold@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Donbas isn’t comparable. The government in Taiwan has had a continuous existence since before the CCP.

        If the rebellious territories of the Donbas was actually a preexisting government that had all the rest of its territory taken in a civil war you might be onto something. In reality Ukraine gained sovereignty from imperial USSR and now imperial Russia wants to take it over again.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Taiwan isn’t a country. They don’t consider themselves independent, China doesn’t consider them independent, the U.S. doesn’t consider them independent.

      How can you consider yourself anti-imperialiat when you don’t know the basic facts of the situation?

    • SexMachineStalin [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Have you considered the possibility that people living in Fuzhou, Putian, Quanzhou, Xiamen and Zhangzhou (among many millions of others along the coast) don’t want to have American nukes pointed at them a mere 200-300 kilometers away?

      Also neither China, the US, the :international-community-1::international-community-2: or the rest of the world do not recognize Taiwan as independent. Only the :nato-cool: despite this, want to wrest Taiwan away to build a puppet state.

      Oh yeah and the official acronymn is “CPC”.