greentreerainfire

What does that make X/Twitter, Crouch-Rot and Clankers?

It will be easier to hackers to hack 2FA when they know what the authenticator app is, versus hundreds of different authenticator clients.

Security through obscurity is not security.

Additionally, any method that generates a code locally that needs to match the server will not be secure if you can extract the key used locally. Yes you can argue that more users makes a juicier target, but I’d argue that Microsoft has the resources spend reducing the chance of an exploit and the resources to fix it fairly quickly. Much more so than any brand new team.

The default authentication option for the company I work for is that a code is displayed in the screen of the device I’m logging into AND a push notification is sent to the Authenticator app, the app then prompts me to enter the code from authenticating device. To break that you’d need the username, password, a clone of the phone/device used to authenticate (or the original), and the user’s PIN for that device (MS Authenticator requires this to complete the authentication.)

Yes MS Authentication services do sometimes go down, and yea it can impact my ability to work

I am by no means a MS fanatic, but I’d trust them for mission critical authentication over something like Authy.

Not an answer to your question, but in the 80s/early 90s my grandmother used to tape movies off the tv, I believe she actually copied VCR to VCR so she could make a copy without commercials. She’d then cut out the description from the TV Guide, and scotch tape it to the top of the video cassette tape.

The “cause” is quite simple: more visibility, knowledge regarding, and acceptance of neurodiversity.

We don’t (usually) just beat kids until they learn to mask now.

Yes we are testing more now that we better understand the conditions. It used to be “understood” that it was mostly boys who had ADHD. Now we understand that girls are/were taught to act in certain ways, forcing them to learn to mask more effectively.

My spouse and I were both diagnosed with ADHD in our late 30s despite having visible symptoms as children.

When I told my parents I was diagnosed with ADHD, their response was “well you turned out fine, didn’t you?”

My employer acknowledges neurodiversity month with presentations by employees who are neurodiverse to help share their perspectives with the “normies.”

My spouse and I are able to look at our children’s behaviors and see the actions through the lense of their being ADHDers. We are able to look back actions and responses of our parents while we were growing up and see their undiagnosed ADHD.

In short, things like ADHD and Autism have been around a lot, in numbers higher than we used to diagnose, and were just getting better at spotting them.

The “cause” is quite simple: more visibility, knowledge regarding, and acceptance of neurodiversity.

We don’t (usually) just beat kids until they learn to mask now.

Yes we are testing more now that we better understand the conditions. It used to be “understood” that it was mostly boys who had ADHD. Now we understand that girls are/were taught to act in certain ways, forcing them to learn to mask more effectively.

My spouse and I were both diagnosed with ADHD in our late 30s despite having visible symptoms as children.

When I told my parents I was diagnosed with ADHD, their response was “well you turned out fine, didn’t you?”

My employer acknowledges neurodiversity month with presentations by employees who are neurodiverse to help share their perspectives with the “normies.”

My spouse and I are able to look at our children’s behaviors and see the actions through the lense of their being ADHDers. We are able to look back actions and responses of our parents while we were growing up and see their undiagnosed ADHD.

In short, things like ADHD and Autism have been around a lot, in numbers higher than we used to diagnose, and were just getting better at spotting them.

Yeah. My grandfather (former electrician and electrical inspector) had a specific outlet he’d plug a gas generator in to back feed power into the house. This was in the 80s and 90s.

He also pointed out that he turned the main off so it did not back feed into the grid and power lines that a lineman is expecting to not be live.

That’d be like outlawing hammers because someone figured out they make a great murder weapon.

Just because you can use a tool for crime, doesn’t mean that tool was designed/intended for crime.

Not exactly. This would be more akin to a company that will 3D printer metal parts and assemble them for you. You use this service and have them create and assemble a gun for you. Then you use that weapon in a violent crime. Should the company have known better that you were having them create an illegal weapon on your behalf?

Unexpected Pink Floyd

Oh we know what is going on already. The court has been stacked in a way that usually favors corporate and authoritarian interests, with justices frequently receiving gifts that aren’t always disclosed.

Now, now, this isn’t Texas.

It’d be used as pretense to escalate police response.

They have been for a while. Weren’t there incidents a couple months ago with former IOF members using military-grade pepper spray on protesters.

Yes all those people draining billions every year giving nothing any keeping the money.

You’re taking about corporate welfare too, right?

Can’t wait for “we are locking you up until you confess”

We already have that, it’s called not being rich and white.

People get strong-armed into confessing all the time. I personally know some one who confessed to arson they didn’t commit, forced to pay restitution, and serve time in a juvenile facility on the weekends.

Why would they confess to something they didn’t do? I asked the same thing from a mutual friend. It turns out they were feeling a lot of pressure because one parent had died and the other one would be left alone if he they were convicted and sent to jail. The plea deal made it plausible to love a semi-normal life.

This person isn’t alone. I’ve met someone else who pled to (as far as I know fictitious) child abuse claims from an ex-spouse to stay out of prison.

It happens all the time.

12 Monkeys (1995)

Paradox (2016)

Both of these movies deal with time travel, I know that is a turn off for some people. Also in both of these movies it’s not that evil overtly wins, it’s more that protagonists fail to prevent the inciting incident from happening. With Paradox it’s not really implied until the last scene what has actually been going on.

12 Monkeys (1995)

Paradox (2016)

Both of these movies deal with time travel, I know that is a turn off for some people.

How old are those debts?

“On February 5, 1997, a civil jury in Santa Monica, California, unanimously found Simpson liable for the wrongful death of and battery against Goldman, and battery against Brown. (The Brown family had not filed a wrongful death claim.)[112] Simpson was ordered to pay $33,500,000 in damages: $8.5 million in compensatory damages to the Goldman family, and $12.5 million in punitive damages to each family.[113] His net worth at the time was $11 million”

Why arent they already paid?

He claimed he didn’t have the money and took actions to reduce his liability / tried to hide income so it wouldn’t be directed toward this debt.

Im assuming theres a reason the court disnt put him back in jail for not paying it?

This is was a civil trial, he was acquitted on the criminal charges. His income was garnished and directed toward this debt.

If they were contesting this for years then why would that not resolve?

The families did keep taking him to court. An example is If I Did It the book he tried to publish and the families took control of the publishing and proceeds, shrinking the “If” so it looks like the title of the book is “I Did It.”

This is a case of the rich/celebrity playing the system in a way normal folk can’t; though in this case the families of the victims kept the pressure up so he needed to watch his step and got financial slap downs when he missteped or was caught trying to keep money without paying them.

Look im not saying i want this. Im saying its gross and shitty but that YOU and I have the right be that way in our wills and this isnt the executors fault.

Too many people think the executor has more decision power than we like at times.

I don’t know what is in the will, but I can certainly imagine it does include directives to reduce payments to the families. I do agree it is the executor’s job to carry out the person’s intentions in the will.