“The biggest scam in YouTube history”

  • DasAlbatross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    They didn’t say anything because they’re not pro consumer, they’re pro linus media group. They didn’t want to appear to be unfriendly to advertisers. There’s a reason tech jesus was able to do a big expose on how crap their videos are. They want to churn out content and make money. Being seen as a problematic channel for advertisers doesn’t help that.

    • runjun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      5 days ago

      lol certain criticisms of LTT are quite funny to me. They literally were “unfriendly to advertisers” with Anker. They’ve done it several times in the past. The “tech Jesus” video you’re referring to caused them to pause production and they haven’t ever returned to a video every day since that came out. 🤷‍♂️ you can just not like their videos, it’s ok.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 days ago

        There’s probably some overlap between people calling for more social responsibility and people who thought some earlier behaviour from LTT was not ok.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Why would being problematic to honey hurt them? If anything, it’d make the other sponsors more confident in their affiliate links. They’ve burnt plenty of brides with Apple and Nvidia, I don’t see why they would be afraid of honey.

      • DasAlbatross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Why would publicly burning an advertiser on their channel cause other advertisers to be reluctant to work worth them?

        Could be any reason.

        • person420@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t have a dog in this fight, but just to play devil’s advocate the advertisers too could have been losing money and be happy it was brought to light?

          • jrs100000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            You are ascribing a lot of human reasoning and emotion to corporate entities they they just dont have. Gratitude is not part of their decision making process. Instead, they might attempt to use past behavior to predict future behavior when evaluating an outlet for their marketing budget. They arnt going to prefer an outlet that occasionally burns advertisers, even if the benefited from it once.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          They’ve had public spats with Anchor and Plex, doesn’t seem to have hurt them too much. I don’t see how honey is more dangerous to them.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            About to entirely make something up

            Maybe there are 10 more advertisers they want to rip on but they already felt two was too many

            IDK!